Weeks of November 2 to 13
R. v. S.A.: (Toronto, College Park) Charges: Theft Under. Allegations: Accused said to have stolen packs of underwear at a major retailer. Result: All charges withdrawn.
R. v. G.C.: (Toronto, College Park) Charges: Assault, Threats. Allegations: Confrontation between employer and employee over wages being owed. Allegations of assault by the employer on the employee. Police are called and owner of business arrested. Result: All charges withdrawn
R. v. S.U. (Toronto, College Park) Charges: Assault (Domestic). Allegations: Accused said to have tossed a plate of food on the complainant after a heated argument in the presence of the accused’s mother. Result: All charges withdrawn.
October 19 to 30, 2009
* Entire two weeks devoted to sexual assault, kidnapping, human trafficking jury trial with two other co-accused.
R. v. A.R. et. al. (Peel Region, Brampton Courthouse) - JURY TRIAL
Charges: Sexual Assault, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Gang Sexual Assault, Kidnapping, Forcible Confinement, Human Trafficking, Sexual Assault with a Weapon, etc.
Allegations: Woman is assaulted, intimidated, and kidnapped in lieu of a debt owed by her boyfriend. When she is taken back to to a residence is Mississauga, she is sexually assaulted, tortured, confined in a closet overnight, and sexually assaulted the following day with forced fellatio and intercourse. During the course of the sexual assault, she is threatened to be forced into prostitution. Woman is released form the premises and attends hospital with injuries. Hospital then reports the incident to police who the obtain evidence that included, but not limited to: DNA, photographs, corroborating physical evidence (shoelaces, descriptions of residence, etc.). Canada wide warrants are executed and four individuals arrested including "A.R." During the course of the proceedings, it was alleged that Mr. A.R. (represented by Sean Robichaud) is alleged to have been present during the entire first day/night but not to have engaged in any of the threats, sexual assaults, or kidnapping but charged and ordered to stand trial regardless.
Result: A.R. is found NOT GUILTY on all counts and dismissed unconditionally at trial. The remaining accused parties are found guilty on al counts with the exception of two.
To see other similar cases on sexual assaults and results, please visit my applicable page on my website located here:
R. v. A.R. et. al. (Peel Region, Brampton Courthouse) - JURY TRIAL
Charges: Sexual Assault, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Gang Sexual Assault, Kidnapping, Forcible Confinement, Human Trafficking, Sexual Assault with a Weapon, etc.
Allegations: Woman is assaulted, intimidated, and kidnapped in lieu of a debt owed by her boyfriend. When she is taken back to to a residence is Mississauga, she is sexually assaulted, tortured, confined in a closet overnight, and sexually assaulted the following day with forced fellatio and intercourse. During the course of the sexual assault, she is threatened to be forced into prostitution. Woman is released form the premises and attends hospital with injuries. Hospital then reports the incident to police who the obtain evidence that included, but not limited to: DNA, photographs, corroborating physical evidence (shoelaces, descriptions of residence, etc.). Canada wide warrants are executed and four individuals arrested including "A.R." During the course of the proceedings, it was alleged that Mr. A.R. (represented by Sean Robichaud) is alleged to have been present during the entire first day/night but not to have engaged in any of the threats, sexual assaults, or kidnapping but charged and ordered to stand trial regardless.
Result: A.R. is found NOT GUILTY on all counts and dismissed unconditionally at trial. The remaining accused parties are found guilty on al counts with the exception of two.
To see other similar cases on sexual assaults and results, please visit my applicable page on my website located here:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)